Having come from a family brought up around drink and at times being someone who has drunk too much too often, it might come as a surprise that I would protest about alcohol abuse. Better perhaps not to mention it lest I draw attention to my own short-comings. However, there is a huge difference between even heavy ‘social’ drinking and the culture of drinking that we are led to believe we as a nation are now gripped.
I believe that we, (and by that I mean the ‘we’ referred to, but rarely identified, in the media), are completely misrepresented and wrongly targeted in the search for a solution. The trigger for the whinge is an advert I have just seen from Tesco, advertising 24 cans of Lager for £10! In my book, that’s not a bargain, it’s totally irresponsible.
Let’s just focus on that word, ‘irresponsible’, ‘without responsibility’ for therein lies the rub. When people in their youth are first introduced to alcohol, in a family environment, there is with it, a responsibility, (or at the very least, an opportunity), upon the adult to demonstrate a sensible approach. In a Pub environment there is a similar responsibility upon the landlord, and indeed fellow drinkers, to moderate and show guidance. I know this sounds idyllic and acknowledge that there are exceptions, but stay with me for a moment. Force, or make attractive, an alternative to this responsible introduction and you end up with youths drinking irresponsibly and taught to do so by their peers.
The emphasis in this latter scenario, is not so much on the ‘social’ aspect of drinking, but rather on the effect of the alcohol itself. To be drunk. With no responsibility, no education and easy access, there is inevitably going to be a disaster.
The whole attitude to drink has totally changed over the years. For hundreds of years, the Public House has been seen as a centre for the community, a meeting place and a place to enjoy good quality beer. With that came some degree of control and in my opinion ‘adequate’ control, inasmuch as the purveyors had both social and legal obligations.
However, things changed, and very rapidly too. The introduction of the happy hour, city centre late night clubs and a breakdown of the family unit could all perhaps be attributed to the change. For me however, it was the availability of cheap supermarket ‘booze’ that was and is the killer.
What has made things worse are the solutions that have been used to resolve it. Firstly, there is a lack of understanding of the core problem, secondly, the targeting of ‘responsible’ drinkers alongside the irresponsible drinkers by application of punitive taxes, and thirdly, by not acting to the full extent of law for those who abuse; both drinkers and providers.
The most dangerous of these three points is the taxing of drinks. Anybody with half an understanding of the real world will tell you, drink abusers don’t buy the bulk of their drinks in pubs. They buy cheap beer and spirits from the supermarket and consume that prior to going out. The pub sells them a few drinks and suffers the consequences along with ‘sensible’ patrons. The pubs take less revenue and people stop going because it’s too expensive. Meanwhile, the ‘problem’ drinkers simply continue to use supermarkets for cheap drink. For goodness sake, stop putting the price up for pub goers, stop supermarkets selling ridiculously cheap ‘booze’ and start prosecuting anti-social drinkers.
Britain’s pubs are part of Britain’s heritage and are to be proud of, not ashamed of. This is what CAMRA has to say.
With the most recent Beer & Pub Association report highlighting that 39 pubs are closing every week, CAMRA has to do more than ever to support local pubs through these difficult times.
CAMRA’s own research shows that 84% of people believe a pub is as essential to village life as a shop or post office. Despite their popularity pubs are still under threat and need our help.